Will Samsung spin off its LCD panel division?

NPD DisplaySearch
By David Hsieh - vice president, Greater China Market and Yoonsung Chung - director, large-area displays & FPD materials, NPD DisplaySearch
Friday, 02 March, 2012


Reports on rumours that Samsung Electronics is considering spinning off its LCD manufacturing division are starting to be published.

There is speculation that such a spin-off could be the first step of a restructuring in the company’s display business, with the end goal of a new display company consisting of Samsung Mobile Display (SMD, an independent company that is the leading manufacturer of AMOLED displays) and Samsung LCD.

This could be the biggest display company covering the key flat panel technologies from small to large sizes.

Samsung Electronics is considering how to make the transition from LCD to AMOLED in the most efficient way possible, by holding on to its leading position in each technology while minimising losses through manufacturing and procurement, as well as business synergies, including support of the company’s wide array of branded products (TVs, monitors, notebook and tablet PCs, smartphones) and external sales.

What is new is that the timeline seems to be moving up, and the restructuring could take place as soon as the middle of 2012.

It is surprising to consider that Samsung might not merge the OLED business into its LCD business, but rather spin off its LCD business and then merge it with the OLED business.

This is a subtle but important difference, reflecting a significant change in Samsung’s flat panel strategy, putting LCD and OLED in an equal position.

DisplaySearch’s research finds that Samsung’s LCD division is the biggest LCD panel maker in terms of revenues and is a key supplier for all applications, not only for its own products, but also many other brands, including Apple’s iPad, Lenovo and HP’s PCs, and many TV makers.

A stand-alone LCD will mean a change in its sales and component sourcing strategies, because its strategy would need to be focused on profitability, rather than supporting the broader electronics strategy, so it should maximise its user base.

In this sense, the new company is likely to care more for non-Samsung users, and act as an independent and neutral LCD and AMOLED supplier. The new company would continue to be an important supplier of the LCDs and OLEDs needed by the Samsung group, but it will have to live on its own financials, which will have an impact on market prices for panels.

Also according to the research, Samsung’s TV business sources over half its LCD TV panels internally (57% in 2011 and plans call for 53% in 2012). The company also buys millions of panels internally for its notebooks, monitors and tablet PCs. Its TV manufacturing has been increasing its vertical integration, purchasing more LCD cells/open cells instead of LCD modules.

If the LCD business is spun off, it could be easier for the company to shift panel buying towards competitors in Taiwan, Japan or even China. In the past, Taiwanese panel makers often had lower use rates than Samsung, because Samsung tended to prioritise its own LCD production during times of oversupply. The spin-off may change this dynamic.

Another aspect of Samsung’s vertical integration has been in supporting component, materials and equipment suppliers. As an independent, the new company will likely put great pressure on its suppliers to drive down its costs.

This could involve buying from non-Samsung suppliers, especially in semiconductor parts, mechanicals, chemicals, optical films and possibly even glass substrates.

If Samsung spins off its LCD business and merges it with SMD, the new company could use resources from LCD - including revenues, cash flows, fabs and engineering - to move towards large-size AMOLED production.

This would be an indication that the future display direction of the Samsung group is AMOLED rather than LCD.

For Samsung Electronics, spinning off its LCD business would likely improve its financial metrics, because the LCD division has been losing money due to ongoing large capital expenditures and falling panel prices.

The flip side of this is that - to fund investments needed for AMOLED - the new company will need new funding sources, including a public listing, since it will be an independent company without the financial support of Samsung Electronics.

The LCD market has been in oversupply since Q2’10, and panel makers have suffered losses during that time. At the same time, AMOLED has matured and gained market acceptance. Panel makers are changing their strategies to reverse their losses and with the most substantial resources in AMOLED, the Samsung group is moving fast to make big changes.

A spin-off of the LCD division will not be the end, but rather the beginning of another big transition in the display industry.

NPD DisplaySearch
http://www.displaysearch.com/

Related Articles

Australia's largest electronics expo returns to Sydney

Electronex, the annual electronics design and assembly expo, will return to Sydney on 19–20...

The fundamentals of Australian RCM compliance

The following information aims to help readers understand the Australian compliance requirements...

Largest ever Electronex Expo in Melbourne

The Electronics Design and Assembly Expo will return to Melbourne from 10–11 May at the...


  • All content Copyright © 2024 Westwick-Farrow Pty Ltd